can anyone give any advice? - Page 2

>>Right. "Satin" is not "split satin". Say the two phrases a few times
>>repeatedly, and you should hear the difference.
> Still wrong, Satin stitch, split or not its still satin stitch.
> Digitizer
> >> Satin stitches do not get shorter but rather span the width
> of the
> item being sewn.
> > Wrong, satin stitches can be mulitple piercings across an
> object.
> Known as "split-satin".
> >> "Tatami" (Japanese for mat) stitches are shorter ones that
> do not
> span the width of the object and take multiple piercings to get
> across the width.
> > Digitizer
> >> I am working with the Tajima program. the height of the
> > letters I am
> working with are about 6.00 in height. how do you make the
> satin
> stitches shorter and how short do I make them? thanks for
> your
> help.
> TIA
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

>My ISP has all the posts since 2003 and your name has never posted before.

>I guess you are new at this group or new to embroidery.

>Semantics is a fine game but I am not interested. The OP still needs help.
>What is your suggestion?

>> Right. "Satin" is not "split satin". Say the two phrases a few

> Still wrong, Satin stitch, split or not its still satin stitch.

>>> Satin stitches do not get shorter but rather span the width
> of the

>> Wrong, satin stitches can be mulitple piercings across an
> object.

>>> "Tatami" (Japanese for mat) stitches are shorter ones that
> do not

>> Digitizer
>>> I am working with the Tajima program. the height of the
>> letters I am
> working with are about 6.00 in height. how do you make

>>My ISP has all the posts since 2003 and your name has never posted
>>before.
> Not all post are kept by your isp. Never heard of the"X-No-Archive"
> header?
>>I guess you are new at this group or new to embroidery.
> Yes you are guessing!
>>Semantics is a fine game but I am not interested. The OP still needs
>>help. What is your suggestion?
> I commented on your definition of "Satin Stitch".
> I haven't seen your suggestion to the OP. Still waiting!
> Having said that, Crafty has to read the manual on splitting "satin
> stitches". I've embroidered 1 foot long thin letters using that
> method. Looks great too! Better than Tatami and a whole lot less
> stitches, as there is no "step stitch" on the end of the rows.
> Digitizer
> >> Right. "Satin" is not "split satin". Say the two phrases a
> few times
> repeatedly, and you should hear the difference.
> > Still wrong, Satin stitch, split or not its still satin
> stitch.
> Digitizer
> >>> Satin stitches do not get shorter but rather span the
> width
> > of the
> item being sewn.
> >> Wrong, satin stitches can be mulitple piercings across an
> > object.
> Known as "split-satin".
> >>> "Tatami" (Japanese for mat) stitches are shorter ones
> that
> > do not
> span the width of the object and take multiple piercings
> to get
> across the width.
> >> Digitizer
> >>> I am working with the Tajima program. the height of the
> >> letters I am
> > working with are about 6.00 in height. how do you
> make the
> satin
> stitches shorter and how short do I make them? thanks
> for
> your
> help.
> TIA
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>

>Good. My ISP has all the posts regardless of the X-no archive setting. They
>are not an archiver and not for public viewing, only subscribers.

>You digitizer has some weird settings and your statements appear to be
>based upon that concept and not logic.

>Wilcom has no such thing as "split satin" and should not have such a thing.

>My help to crafty was posted as the first response. Troll away.

>> My ISP has all the posts since 2003 and your name has never posted

> Not all post are kept by your isp. Never heard of the"X-No-Archive"

>> I guess you are new at this group or new to embroidery.
> Yes you are guessing!
>> Semantics is a fine game but I am not interested. The OP still

> I commented on your definition of "Satin Stitch".

>>> Right. "Satin" is not "split satin". Say the two phrases a
> few times

>> Still wrong, Satin stitch, split or not its still satin
> stitch.

>>>> Satin stitches do not get shorter but rather span the
> width
>> of the
> item being sewn.
>>> Wrong, satin stitches can be mulitple piercings across an
>> object.
> Known as "split-satin".
>>>> "Tatami" (Japanese for mat) stitches are shorter ones
> that
>> do not
> span the width of the object and take multiple piercings

>>> Digitizer
>>>> I am working with the Tajima program. the height of the
>>> letters I am
>> working with are about 6.00 in height. how do you
> make the

>>Good. My ISP has all the posts regardless of the X-no archive
>>setting. They are not an archiver and not for public viewing, only
>>subscribers.
> How do you know your isp has all posts posted since 2003?
> And how many posts have their been in this group since January 1
> 2003?
>>You digitizer has some weird settings and your statements appear to
>>be based upon that concept and not logic.
> And you know this how?
>>Wilcom has no such thing as "split satin" and should not have such a
>>thing.
> Which wilcom program are you talking about?
>>My help to crafty was posted as the first response. Troll away.
> Definitions of stitches helps the OP in what way?
> Digitizer
> >> My ISP has all the posts since 2003 and your name has never
> posted
> before.
> > Not all post are kept by your isp. Never heard of
> the"X-No-Archive"
> header?
> >> I guess you are new at this group or new to embroidery.
> > Yes you are guessing!
> >> Semantics is a fine game but I am not interested. The OP
> still needs
> help. What is your suggestion?
> > I commented on your definition of "Satin Stitch".
> I haven't seen your suggestion to the OP. Still waiting!
> Having said that, Crafty has to read the manual on splitting
> "satin
> stitches". I've embroidered 1 foot long thin letters using that
> method. Looks great too! Better than Tatami and a whole lot
> less
> stitches, as there is no "step stitch" on the end of the rows.
> Digitizer
> >>> Right. "Satin" is not "split satin". Say the two phrases
> a
> > few times
> repeatedly, and you should hear the difference.
> >> Still wrong, Satin stitch, split or not its still satin
> > stitch.
> Digitizer
> >>>> Satin stitches do not get shorter but rather span the
> > width
> >> of the
> > item being sewn.
> >>> Wrong, satin stitches can be mulitple piercings across
> an
> >> object.
> > Known as "split-satin".
> >>>> "Tatami" (Japanese for mat) stitches are shorter ones
> > that
> >> do not
> > span the width of the object and take multiple
> piercings
> to get
> across the width.
> >>> Digitizer
> >>>> I am working with the Tajima program. the height of
> the
> >>> letters I am
> >> working with are about 6.00 in height. how do
> you
> > make the
> satin
> stitches shorter and how short do I make them?
> thanks
> for
> your
> help.
> TIA
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>