|
Posted by Digitizer on December 20, 2006, 10:46 pm
show/hide quoted text
> Duh. The OP asked about stitches.
You avoided the question. Why?
//restore
show/hide quoted text
> My help to crafty was posted as the first response. Troll away.
Definitions of stitches helps the OP in what way?
//end restore
show/hide quoted text
> I believe you have a reading comprehension and trolling problem.
> Since June 25, 2003 I have 8528 messages. I see posts with X Archive No in
> them, first line. You should know all that though. My IPS is not an
> archive. remember I stated that? I didn't think so.
So, you don't have all posts since 2003 as you stated. Remember 2003 starts
at January 1st.
You said:
show/hide quoted text
<Quote>
My ISP has all the posts since 2003 and your name has never posted
before.
show/hide quoted text
</Quote>
> Reading comprehension problem.
You have a memory problem?
show/hide quoted text
> Next troll?
Still waiting to see your suggestion to the OP, not a stitch definition!
Share your knowledge please! Will we see it?
I doubt it!
Digitizer
show/hide quoted text
>> Good. My ISP has all the posts regardless of the X-no archive
setting. They are not an archiver and not for public viewing, only
subscribers.
show/hide quoted text
> How do you know your isp has all posts posted since 2003?
And how many posts have their been in this group since January 1
2003?
show/hide quoted text
>> You digitizer has some weird settings and your statements appear
to
be based upon that concept and not logic.
show/hide quoted text
> And you know this how?
>> Wilcom has no such thing as "split satin" and should not have such
a
thing.
show/hide quoted text
> Which wilcom program are you talking about?
>> My help to crafty was posted as the first response. Troll away.
> Definitions of stitches helps the OP in what way?
Digitizer
show/hide quoted text
>>> My ISP has all the posts since 2003 and your name has never
> posted
before.
show/hide quoted text
>> Not all post are kept by your isp. Never heard of
> the"X-No-Archive"
header?
show/hide quoted text
>>> I guess you are new at this group or new to embroidery.
>> Yes you are guessing!
>>> Semantics is a fine game but I am not interested. The OP
> still needs
help. What is your suggestion?
show/hide quoted text
>> I commented on your definition of "Satin Stitch".
> I haven't seen your suggestion to the OP. Still waiting!
Having said that, Crafty has to read the manual on splitting
"satin
stitches". I've embroidered 1 foot long thin letters using that
method. Looks great too! Better than Tatami and a whole lot
less
stitches, as there is no "step stitch" on the end of the rows.
Digitizer
show/hide quoted text
>>>> Right. "Satin" is not "split satin". Say the two phrases
> a
>> few times
> repeatedly, and you should hear the difference.
>>> Still wrong, Satin stitch, split or not its still satin
>> stitch.
> Digitizer
>>>>> Satin stitches do not get shorter but rather span the
>> width
>>> of the
>> item being sewn.
>>>> Wrong, satin stitches can be mulitple piercings across
> an
>>> object.
>> Known as "split-satin".
>>>>> "Tatami" (Japanese for mat) stitches are shorter ones
>> that
>>> do not
>> span the width of the object and take multiple
> piercings
to get
across the width.
show/hide quoted text
>>>> Digitizer
>>>>> I am working with the Tajima program. the height of
> the
>>>> letters I am
>>> working with are about 6.00 in height. how do
> you
>> make the
> satin
stitches shorter and how short do I make them?
thanks
for
your
help.
TIA
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap