If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Lucille on October 29, 2009, 4:20 pm
show/hide quoted text
>> <lucretiaborgia wrote
>>> You're not really posting at rctn - this is a cut/paste/link job by
>>> those damn forum idiots. I think it is very rude, too bad, so sad
>>> nobody on your forum can help. Maybe you should join rctn instead.
>> I went to this "forum" this morning. All it is is a set of links to
>> other usenet groups, along with many many advertisements--there is no
>> "group" there to field questions and help each other. Cranky as we can
>> get sometimes, at least we know there is a group of real people here.
>> Dawne
>> Add me to this list of annoyed people. They were posting my notes on
>> their site too and I was wildly upset about it. I sent them a note
>> asking them politely to remove me from their list. When I got no
>> satisfaction I sent them a rather nasty one demanding that they remove me
>> or I would report them.
>> I never heard from them again and assumed they did remove me.
Sorry for the hiccups. My newsgroup was upset and acting like a cranky
toddler.
L
show/hide quoted text
>
|
|
Posted by on October 29, 2009, 2:45 pm
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:04 -0600, "Dawne Peterson"
show/hide quoted text
><lucretiaborgia wrote
>> You're not really posting at rctn - this is a cut/paste/link job by
>> those damn forum idiots. I think it is very rude, too bad, so sad
>> nobody on your forum can help. Maybe you should join rctn instead.
>I went to this "forum" this morning. All it is is a set of links to other
>usenet groups, along with many many advertisements--there is no "group"
>there to field questions and help each other. Cranky as we can get
>sometimes, at least we know there is a group of real people here.
>Dawne
All those forums want numbers and this 'linking' is done to make it
appear they have those numbers, generally because a prolific forum
generates money through advertising.
With one of my usenet groups we were 'linked' and in the end without
exception everytime a link cropped up we were rude in the extreme -
can you tell how quickly the 'linking' stopped then lol
It was annoying mostly because there was no continuity because half
the posters were in effect 'ghosts'. Plus people should not repost
peoples posts without at least asking or seeking their permission.
As I said, at best, appalling manners.
|
|
Posted by on October 29, 2009, 2:59 pm
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:45:11 -0300, lucretiaborgia@fl.it wrote:
This is a post that Lucille wants sent but which won't go through, so
she asked me to post it for her.
" Add me to this list of annoyed people. They were posting my notes
on their site too and I was wildly upset about it. I sent them a
note asking them politely to remove me from their list. When I got no
satisfaction I sent them a rather nasty one demanding that they
remove me or I would report them.
I never heard from them again and assume they did remove me."
Lucille
|
|
Posted by Donna D. on October 30, 2009, 4:47 pm
I will have to actually look. I have a few of these magazines so I might .
It is a magazine that had all types of needlework in it. Why is it wrong to
ask ?
Donna
show/hide quoted text
> I had a pattern for mittens that were animals that I knit for my kids.. I
> would like to knit some for my grandchildren but of course can't find the
> pattern. I'm sure it came from McCall's Needlework in about 1980, but I'm
> not absolutly sure of the year. There was a poodle pattern and a cow that
> I remember. If anyone has one I sure would appreciate hearing from you.
> -------------------------------------
> ##-----------------------------------------------##
> Delivered via http://www.sewgirls.com/
> Sewing Community of the Net
> Web and RSS access to your favorite newsgroup -
> rec.crafts.textiles.needlework - 52247 messages and counting!
> ##-----------------------------------------------##
|
|
Posted by Ruby on October 30, 2009, 9:30 pm
Because lucretia says so thats why.
ruby
Donna D. wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> I will have to actually look. I have a few of these magazines so I might .
> It is a magazine that had all types of needlework in it. Why is it wrong to
> ask ?
> Donna
>
|
Page 7 of 8 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: McCalls Needlework and Crafts mitten patterns | October 29, 2009, 2:39 pm |
| Mission style/Arts & Crafts crochet patterns? | December 27, 2007, 9:17 pm |
| Re: Those who love crafts and needlework | June 6, 2008, 11:00 am |
| Re: Those who love crafts and needlework | June 6, 2008, 11:37 am |
| Cost of Needlework Patterns | April 19, 2005, 2:10 pm |
| Amy Mitten Samplers | October 2, 2006, 9:50 pm |
| crafts from Nepal | September 14, 2007, 4:04 am |
| crafts very interesting!! | February 21, 2009, 2:18 pm |
| Tea Room crafts, cooking, etc. | July 29, 2005, 2:01 pm |
| Landmark Crafts - still operating? | December 11, 2006, 3:51 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>>> You're not really posting at rctn - this is a cut/paste/link job by
>>> those damn forum idiots. I think it is very rude, too bad, so sad
>>> nobody on your forum can help. Maybe you should join rctn instead.
>> I went to this "forum" this morning. All it is is a set of links to
>> other usenet groups, along with many many advertisements--there is no
>> "group" there to field questions and help each other. Cranky as we can
>> get sometimes, at least we know there is a group of real people here.
>> Dawne
>> Add me to this list of annoyed people. They were posting my notes on
>> their site too and I was wildly upset about it. I sent them a note
>> asking them politely to remove me from their list. When I got no
>> satisfaction I sent them a rather nasty one demanding that they remove me
>> or I would report them.
>> I never heard from them again and assumed they did remove me.