If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by NDJoan on September 4, 2009, 10:50 am
show/hide quoted text
> I hope so, and Joan too.
I've heard it before, am not a math whiz, but it still brought a smile
to my face! :) See?
Joan
|
|
Posted by Cheryl Isaak on September 4, 2009, 12:16 pm
On 9/3/09 6:41 PM, in article 6fh0a5t15gl46rb8n1hb9ju08sn5sh8n2d@4ax.com,
show/hide quoted text
> wrote:
>
>> Don't blame me-I just copy them from someone else
>>
>>
>> Native Math
>>
>> .There were three pregnant Indian squaws laying on animal hides about to
>> give birth.
>>
>> The first squaw, who was laying on a buffalo hide, gave birth to a 6 lb., 5
>> oz. baby boy.
>>
>> The second, who was laying on a deer hide, gave birth to a 5 lb., 5 oz. baby
>> boy.
>>
>> The third, who was laying on a hippopotamus hide, gave birth to twin boys
>> totaling 11 lb., 10 oz.
>>
>> Therefore, we can conclude that the sons of the squaw on the hippopotamus
>> hide equals the sons of the squaws on the other two hides.
>
>
> Ooh, ooh not even pc girl !
The worst part is that I heard this as teenager! and it's still haunting me
C
|
|
Posted by on September 4, 2009, 3:34 pm
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:16:41 -0400, Cheryl Isaak
show/hide quoted text
>On 9/3/09 6:41 PM, in article 6fh0a5t15gl46rb8n1hb9ju08sn5sh8n2d@4ax.com,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Don't blame me-I just copy them from someone else
>>>
>>>
>>> Native Math
>>>
>>> .There were three pregnant Indian squaws laying on animal hides about to
>>> give birth.
>>>
>>> The first squaw, who was laying on a buffalo hide, gave birth to a 6 lb., 5
>>> oz. baby boy.
>>>
>>> The second, who was laying on a deer hide, gave birth to a 5 lb., 5 oz. baby
>>> boy.
>>>
>>> The third, who was laying on a hippopotamus hide, gave birth to twin boys
>>> totaling 11 lb., 10 oz.
>>>
>>> Therefore, we can conclude that the sons of the squaw on the hippopotamus
>>> hide equals the sons of the squaws on the other two hides.
>>
>>
>> Ooh, ooh not even pc girl !
>The worst part is that I heard this as teenager! and it's still haunting me
>C
So old it's dead now ?
|
|
Posted by Lucille on September 4, 2009, 3:50 pm
show/hide quoted text
> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:16:41 -0400, Cheryl Isaak
>>On 9/3/09 6:41 PM, in article 6fh0a5t15gl46rb8n1hb9ju08sn5sh8n2d@4ax.com,
>>> wrote:
>>>> Don't blame me-I just copy them from someone else
>>>> Native Math
>>>> .There were three pregnant Indian squaws laying on animal hides about
>>>> to
>>>> give birth.
>>>> The first squaw, who was laying on a buffalo hide, gave birth to a 6
>>>> lb., 5
>>>> oz. baby boy.
>>>> The second, who was laying on a deer hide, gave birth to a 5 lb., 5 oz.
>>>> baby
>>>> boy.
>>>> The third, who was laying on a hippopotamus hide, gave birth to twin
>>>> boys
>>>> totaling 11 lb., 10 oz.
>>>> Therefore, we can conclude that the sons of the squaw on the
>>>> hippopotamus
>>>> hide equals the sons of the squaws on the other two hides.
>>> Ooh, ooh not even pc girl !
>>The worst part is that I heard this as teenager! and it's still haunting
>>me
>>C
> So old it's dead now ?
Am I the only one who thought this was new. Oh well! It was new to me.
|
|
Posted by on September 4, 2009, 4:05 pm
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:16:41 -0400, Cheryl Isaak
>>>On 9/3/09 6:41 PM, in article 6fh0a5t15gl46rb8n1hb9ju08sn5sh8n2d@4ax.com,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Don't blame me-I just copy them from someone else
>>>>> Native Math
>>>>> .There were three pregnant Indian squaws laying on animal hides about
>>>>> to
>>>>> give birth.
>>>>> The first squaw, who was laying on a buffalo hide, gave birth to a 6
>>>>> lb., 5
>>>>> oz. baby boy.
>>>>> The second, who was laying on a deer hide, gave birth to a 5 lb., 5 oz.
>>>>> baby
>>>>> boy.
>>>>> The third, who was laying on a hippopotamus hide, gave birth to twin
>>>>> boys
>>>>> totaling 11 lb., 10 oz.
>>>>> Therefore, we can conclude that the sons of the squaw on the
>>>>> hippopotamus
>>>>> hide equals the sons of the squaws on the other two hides.
>>>> Ooh, ooh not even pc girl !
>>>The worst part is that I heard this as teenager! and it's still haunting
>>>me
>>>C
>> So old it's dead now ?
>Am I the only one who thought this was new. Oh well! It was new to me.
I hadn't heard it, I just thought, from her post maybe Cheryl was
older than us dear lol
|
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 > last >>
|
|