If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Kate XXXXXX on October 11, 2009, 3:33 am
onetexsun wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> Have any of you used Aurafil? I love the stuff I have and I'm craving
> some of their gorgeous variegated threads. Anybody try King Tut and
> Aurafil and can tell about the difference?
>
> Sunny
I have some Aurifil and love it. King Tut will have to be good to beat
that. I also love YLI's cottons and their silk thread, and the new
Coats Cotton, Seta Reale, and Duet ( NOT to be confused with Dual Duty,
which is evil) polyester for clothing construction..
--
Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.katedicey.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore!
|
|
Posted by Patti on October 11, 2009, 6:48 am
I have tried both. They both sew beautifully. So far I can say that
the Aurifil variegated (the one I have anyone) has a more 'restrained'
colour range than the King Tut. The spool almost 'reads as a solid
turquoise', though there are stretches of cream in there. and different
shades of the main colour. The Aurifil has more sheen.
show/hide quoted text
Please note: this is not an exhaustive survey >g<.
.
In message
show/hide quoted text
>Have any of you used Aurafil? I love the stuff I have and I'm craving
>some of their gorgeous variegated threads. Anybody try King Tut and
>Aurafil and can tell about the difference?
>Sunny
--
Best Regards
pat on the hill
|
|
Posted by EstelleUK on October 11, 2009, 9:35 am
Not too much difference, they are both easy on my sm, but I do lean towards
King Tut.
--
http://community.webshots.com/user/EstelleUK11 show/hide quoted text
> Have any of you used Aurafil? I love the stuff I have and I'm craving
> some of their gorgeous variegated threads. Anybody try King Tut and
> Aurafil and can tell about the difference?
> Sunny
|
|
Posted by Sandy on October 11, 2009, 10:31 am
In article
show/hide quoted text
> Have any of you used Aurafil? I love the stuff I have and I'm craving
> some of their gorgeous variegated threads. Anybody try King Tut and
> Aurafil and can tell about the difference?
>
> Sunny
Aurifil is a finer thread than King Tut. Both are fantastic threads,
Sunny! You'll want to use KT when you want the thread to stand out more;
the Aurifil will give a more subtle effect.
--
Sandy in Henderson, near Las Vegas
sw.foster1 (at) gmail (dot) com (remove/change the obvious)
http://www.sandymike.net
|
|
Posted by Sherry on October 11, 2009, 11:17 am
show/hide quoted text
> Have any of you used Aurafil? I love the stuff I have and I'm craving
> some of their gorgeous variegated threads. Anybody try King Tut and
> Aurafil and can tell about the difference?
> Sunny
No, I have not tried Aurafil yet, but would like to try it.
Speaking of thread, I always buy regular handquilting thread
for handquilting (mettler or gutterman is what's available here).
I do this because that's what I was told to use and I always
do what I'm told :-)
Question is, how come you can't just use machine quilting
thread to hand quilt?
Sherry
|
Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Blue & Yellow king-sized monster finally done! | July 7, 2007, 2:58 pm |
| King Sized Summer-Weight Quilt finished | April 18, 2009, 6:48 pm |
| Sulky 12 wt. thread & Presencia thread | December 29, 2007, 7:38 pm |
| Question about Size of King Size Quilt | July 28, 2007, 7:34 pm |
| Thread about thread. | August 30, 2005, 2:44 am |
| How much thread should I buy? | January 18, 2007, 1:53 pm |
| Thread | May 24, 2008, 11:10 pm |
| New Thread? | July 20, 2007, 10:02 pm |
| thread | August 31, 2007, 12:51 pm |
| What to do with all the thread | October 5, 2007, 4:30 pm |
|
|
> some of their gorgeous variegated threads. Anybody try King Tut and
> Aurafil and can tell about the difference?
>
> Sunny