|
Posted by J* on September 18, 2009, 9:35 pm
you're setting records there tho.
everyone that does each various cut/#of pieces will see you're record time
and want to beat it.
i just had Sam using the computer so was afk for a while.
now i'll go back and continue with the 240 classic view.
lets see what i can do it in....with cheating of course. :)
memory like a sieve on an island is not a good thing, the water keeps
getting in,
j.
"Louise in Iowa" wrote ...
When I tried the 48-piece classic the second time, I cut nearly two minutes
from my original time. Then, for kicks, I went to a 20-piece classic and did
it in 59 seconds. You're right - you'd think Karen and I would remember
where each and every block was, but my memory just doesn't always oblige!
--
Louise in Iowa
nieland1390@mchsi dot com
http://community.webshots.com/user/louiseiniowa
"J*" wrote ...
show/hide quoted text
> no idea how long that took you to quilt it but i'd think you and Karen
> both
> should have few problems getting it done in record time.
> try change cut and see how much better you get each time.
> click on timer at left and it stops while you think or get a cuppa or
> whatever.
show/hide quoted text
> "Louise in Iowa" wrote ...
> Yes, it did! I changed it to 48-piece classic, but I don't think I'll tell
> you how long it took me to complete it! I think I should try again.
show/hide quoted text
> "J*" wrote ...
>> http://www.jigzone.com/puzzles/7514786D8EF?m=3825072AFE.578F28E&z=6
>> see if this works.
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> both
> should have few problems getting it done in record time.
> try change cut and see how much better you get each time.
> click on timer at left and it stops while you think or get a cuppa or
> whatever.