All right........

Sewing Discussions - A group that is not as it seams. 

Page 5 of 9       < 1 2 3 > last >> Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
All right........ The Wanderer 02-06-2008
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by FarmI on February 12, 2008, 6:32 pm
> Mary Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>>Here in the colonies, lawns and lawnmowers have great meaning to the male
>>>of the species.

>> I can't understand it - I thought it was a peculiarly English thing!

Nah! It's more universal than that.

> I think it has the same roots. Only the well-to-do can afford fallow
> land. A place to play croquet and badmitten - both of which I probably
> mispelled. A pasture without a cow or a goat or even some chickens must
> be an indicator of wealth, right? Even more so if the growth is cut but
> not put to use. Aspirations of grandeur.

I don't think I necessarily would agree from a colonial perspective. In
Britain, then maybe, but given that we former colonials actually had some
rather nasty beasts to contend with, then there was an advantage in not
having rank and rampant growth near the house that you need to tramp through
t get to the clothes line or chook pen or somesuch.

Even now, I have venomous snakes so need to keep an eye out. Just a couple
of weeks ago we saw a 4 ft Brown Snake going into my rose garden and this
snake is far more venomous than a Cobra.

I remember from my childhood in the country that if a family didn't have a
lawn mower or if the farmer was too busy to do much in the way of garden
work, then they had a tethered sheep to do the lawn mowing. It made for
some interesting walks round the garden as there were running wires with the
chain attached to it leading to the sheep and which allowed the sheep move
up and down the wire and to reach the grass on "the Lawn" but not get into
the flower beds.

Fran



Posted by Pogonip on February 12, 2008, 6:40 pm
FarmI wrote:
>
>>Mary Fisher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>Here in the colonies, lawns and lawnmowers have great meaning to the male
>>>>of the species.
>
>
>>>I can't understand it - I thought it was a peculiarly English thing!
>
>
> Nah! It's more universal than that.
>
>
>>I think it has the same roots. Only the well-to-do can afford fallow
>>land. A place to play croquet and badmitten - both of which I probably
>>mispelled. A pasture without a cow or a goat or even some chickens must
>>be an indicator of wealth, right? Even more so if the growth is cut but
>>not put to use. Aspirations of grandeur.
>
>
> I don't think I necessarily would agree from a colonial perspective. In
> Britain, then maybe, but given that we former colonials actually had some
> rather nasty beasts to contend with, then there was an advantage in not
> having rank and rampant growth near the house that you need to tramp through
> t get to the clothes line or chook pen or somesuch.
>
> Even now, I have venomous snakes so need to keep an eye out. Just a couple
> of weeks ago we saw a 4 ft Brown Snake going into my rose garden and this
> snake is far more venomous than a Cobra.
>
> I remember from my childhood in the country that if a family didn't have a
> lawn mower or if the farmer was too busy to do much in the way of garden
> work, then they had a tethered sheep to do the lawn mowing. It made for
> some interesting walks round the garden as there were running wires with the
> chain attached to it leading to the sheep and which allowed the sheep move
> up and down the wire and to reach the grass on "the Lawn" but not get into
> the flower beds.
>
> Fran
>
>
I would submit that it is an adaptation, and a very sensible one in your
case. This was not my source, but was the first result on Google to my
inquiry:
http://www.allaboutlawns.com/lawn-maintenance-care/landscaping-and-gardening/the-history-behind-lawns.php

--
Joanne
stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us.earth.milky-way.com
http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/

Posted by FarmI on February 12, 2008, 8:06 pm
> FarmI wrote:

>>>I think it has the same roots. Only the well-to-do can afford fallow
>>>land. A place to play croquet and badmitten - both of which I probably
>>>mispelled. A pasture without a cow or a goat or even some chickens must
>>>be an indicator of wealth, right? Even more so if the growth is cut but
>>>not put to use. Aspirations of grandeur.
>>
>>
>> I don't think I necessarily would agree from a colonial perspective. In
>> Britain, then maybe, but given that we former colonials actually had some
>> rather nasty beasts to contend with, then there was an advantage in not
>> having rank and rampant growth near the house that you need to tramp
>> through t get to the clothes line or chook pen or somesuch.
>>
>> Even now, I have venomous snakes so need to keep an eye out. Just a
>> couple of weeks ago we saw a 4 ft Brown Snake going into my rose garden
>> and this snake is far more venomous than a Cobra.
>>
>> I remember from my childhood in the country that if a family didn't have
>> a lawn mower or if the farmer was too busy to do much in the way of
>> garden work, then they had a tethered sheep to do the lawn mowing. It
>> made for some interesting walks round the garden as there were running
>> wires with the chain attached to it leading to the sheep and which
>> allowed the sheep move up and down the wire and to reach the grass on
>> "the Lawn" but not get into the flower beds.
>>
>> Fran
> I would submit that it is an adaptation, and a very sensible one in your
> case. This was not my source, but was the first result on Google to my
> inquiry:
>
http://www.allaboutlawns.com/lawn-maintenance-care/landscaping-and-gardening/the-history-behind-lawns.php

I found this site which may interest you. I found it very interesting (who
would think to write a book on Lawns?). Having read this, I don't resonate
with it at all. I suspect we colonials might have diverged in our lawn
attitudes:
http://www.nrec.org/synapse37/drake.html

Having a green and lush lawn here is now seen as being quite antisocial and
irresponsible - not surprisingly. I certainly don't think it has ever been
quite as much of a status symbol here as it seems to have been elsewhere.
The house and/or the farm were that, but the "lawn" was always just grass
(with some statistically minor exceptions).



Posted by Pogonip on February 13, 2008, 1:59 am
FarmI wrote:
>>I would submit that it is an adaptation, and a very sensible one in your
>>case. This was not my source, but was the first result on Google to my
>>inquiry:
>>http://www.allaboutlawns.com/lawn-maintenance-care/landscaping-and-gardening/the-history-behind-lawns.php
>
>
> I found this site which may interest you. I found it very interesting (who
> would think to write a book on Lawns?). Having read this, I don't resonate
> with it at all. I suspect we colonials might have diverged in our lawn
> attitudes:
> http://www.nrec.org/synapse37/drake.html
>
> Having a green and lush lawn here is now seen as being quite antisocial and
> irresponsible - not surprisingly. I certainly don't think it has ever been
> quite as much of a status symbol here as it seems to have been elsewhere.
> The house and/or the farm were that, but the "lawn" was always just grass
> (with some statistically minor exceptions).
>
>

Thanks! That was quite a fun read!
--
Joanne
stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us.earth.milky-way.com
http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/

Posted by FarmI on February 12, 2008, 8:08 pm

> I would submit that it is an adaptation, and a very sensible one in your
> case. This was not my source, but was the first result on Google to my
> inquiry:
>
http://www.allaboutlawns.com/lawn-maintenance-care/landscaping-and-gardening/the-history-behind-lawns.php

Just found this site of sheep on the White House lawn. I thought was quite
priceless:
http://www.landscape-america.com/history/history_lawn.html



Page 5 of 9       < 1 2 3 > last >>

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Sewgirls.com XML SitemapXML Sitemap