|
Posted by Val on September 17, 2006, 2:10 am
The last time I saw a size 2 was 36 years ago and I was tying it on my son's
FOOT!
*sigh"
Val
> Pogonip wrote:
>> There is an ad for a diet, and the young woman in it is
>> all excited because she is wearing a size 2. She looks
>> to me like about a 10 or 12. Have sizes changed?
>
> Yes. RTW has, IMHO, done some major size "deflation". What was a size 10
> in 1960 is now a size 2(?), the old size 12 is now a 4, etc. Makes
> today's teens (and I suppose matrons, too) feel so much more like buying
> clothes if they can wear an off-the-rack 4.
>
>>When I
>> was skinny, which was a long time ago, I wore a 10, and
>> my bones stuck out. I am (was?) 5'6" and weighed 115. A
>> friend wore a 6, but she was 4'10" and weighed 85 lbs.
>
> My wedding gown was made from a size 12 pattern, I was 5'6", and weighed
> 118 pounds, and very slender.
> http://home.comcast.net/~beidesigns/wsb/html/view.cgi-image.html--graphic.html
>
> The commercial pattern industry did a complete overhaul of measurements
> and sizes in the mid-60s(anyone remember the date?) and from that point on
> I bought size 10 patterns with basically the same measurements as the old
> size 12, so the pattern industry was just trying to stay on a par with
> RTW. But RTW continued the down-sizing phoniness.
>
>> I am having a hard time getting my mind around this "size
>> 2." Am I off base here?
>
> Not if it's a toddler size... ;-> Sheesh, my slender 11-year-old
> granddaughter wears a girl's size 10-12, and was able to purchase cute
> jacket in a teen shop in size "6". No adult woman is capable of wearing a
> *true* size 2, IMNSHO, that's just appealing to her vanity.
>
> Glad I sew...
>
> Beverly
>
|