|
Posted by Kate XXXXXX on June 29, 2009, 3:59 pm
wurstergirl wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know any reason why one should not switch in different
> underwires into a bra? Different as in different size/shape. Is
> there some mathematical reason? It seems to me that my rib cage is
> narrow side to side but deep front to back. So I need a narrower
> curved wire than the standard combinations for band+cup. I've got the
> right size wires so I thought I'd try it. Not earth-shattering, just
> thought I'd ask.
>
> Pora
I also have a narrow ribcage, and I've pondered this a few times. You
might find that the shape the fabric of the band and the cup as it is
cut to accommodate the wider wire will pull the narrower shape out at
the sides. You may want to cut a band that is the same shape as the
wire where the cups fit into it...
If the wider wire is like this,
| |
____/ then the 'hole' in the band will be the same profile. For a
band shaped more like this:
| |
__/ then you'll need a 'hole' of the same size and shape, with the
bulk for the breast in the same volume of cup cut deeper from chest wall
to apex too.
Engineering problem: same volume, different shape...
--
Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.katedicey.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore!
|
>
> Does anyone know any reason why one should not switch in different
> underwires into a bra? Different as in different size/shape. Is
> there some mathematical reason? It seems to me that my rib cage is
> narrow side to side but deep front to back. So I need a narrower
> curved wire than the standard combinations for band+cup. I've got the
> right size wires so I thought I'd try it. Not earth-shattering, just
> thought I'd ask.
>
> Pora