|
Posted by Kate Dicey on June 13, 2006, 6:08 pm
jack@schmidling.com wrote:
> Kate Dicey wrote:
>
>
>>Jack, ate these traditional gents slacks type pockets?
>
>
> I guess but I am having trouble understanding the definitions of
> pockets.
>
> It is an inseam pocket but it is slanted a bit as a result of the way
> the front is attached to the back facing. It is about an inch forward
> of the side seam so I do not know if this qualifies as a slant pocket.
A traditional slant pocket is formed at the side seam. The top of the
pocket, where the front of the trouser joins the back is an inch or so
forward of the side seam, to allow access. The bit of the pocket bag
thus exposed is disguised with a facing in the face (outer) fabric.
>
> I have worked over several instrustion sets and they all are different
> enough to create some confusion.
The best I have seen so far were those in the Vogue gents suit pattern.
>
> The Simplicity instructions in the basic pattern makes the bag with
> facings attached, French seam and then stitches this into the side
> seams. The problem is at the bottom of the opening, all seams end at
> the dot but it is impossible to layer things neatly and I usually end
> up with an opening I can stick my finger through.
Which pattern number is this?
>
> The Reader's Digest book has a two piece bag, each piece of which is
> stitched to the appropriate side before constructing the pocket.
Not finished to look like suit or slacks pockets, then.
>
> CTT is a variation on the first but the pocket is vertical and hard to
> get the hand into and the waist came out too small because of the lack
> of that one inch space described above.
The inch should in no way be added to the waist circumference: it is
taken OFF the front of the trousers to expose the inside of the pocket
with the face fabric applied to disguise it. It sounds like a
misreading of the instructions has lead to this inch being closed up
rather than allowed to lie flat.
>
> I just did the second pocket on shorts I am making and stitched the two
> sides of the bag in and then did the French seam and this seems to have
> worked much better. I also went about an inch below the the dot and
> wonder if this might be the whole problem, vis., stitching up to and
> down from the dot as in Simplicity provedes no overlap.
I'm not at all sure what you are getting at. I stitch the pocket in
place, from top to bottom, then start at the waistband, swivel at a
point 5/8ths down the pocket bag, go round it to a similar point at the
bottom of the pocket, swivel again and continue down the seam.
This makes a great pocket for summer shorts, dresses, and anywhere that
a loose but hidden pocket can be let into a seam.
>
>
>>What I do is
>>assemble the pocket bag and attach to the front of the trouser leg
>>before sewing the side seam.
>
>
> Is this French seamed already?
No French seams involved. They are too bulky for this, and don't go
well round the pocket curves.
>
> I am leaving the rest of this so I can send it to myself and read off
> line.
>
:)
--
Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls
Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons
http://www.katedicey.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore!
|