|
Posted by robb on November 26, 2007, 11:38 pm
> robb wrote:
> > my wife ask me a dreaded question the other day.
> >
> > A man at work wants to know what i thought of the new singer
> > portables because he was thinking to buy one for his mother
for
> > christmas because she likes to go to those quilting
conferences
> > and quilting retreat/get together/meetings etc. and *he*
wanted
> > something light and portable for her to carry.
> >
> > well, i could respond as i only knew how.
> >
> > he should ask the mother what machine(s) she would love to
add to
> > her collection ? or what machine she would love to carry to a
> > quilting conference ? or best drive her to a shop and let her
> > pick one out ?
> >
> > I suggested the new singer portables are not well respected
and
> > she might easily prefer a vintage Featherweight over a new
> > portable machine ? The machines all have varying
dispositions,
> > personalities and will need to decide which personality she
> > likes.
> >
> > any other things i might mention ?,
> > rob
> >
>
> The Singer 301 is a relatively undiscovered gem for quilters on
the go.
> It uses the same bobbin case and bobbins as the FW, is
light-weight,
> even more portable as it has a built-in handle. It weighs a
couple of
> pounds more than the FW, but is a full-sized machine with lots
of room
> for fabric under the arm. These machines are often found in
cabinets of
> the usual Singer variety, but instead of being hinged in, have
a
> quick-release lever that allows you to pick up the machine by
the handle
> and head out the door. It's also a slant-needle machine, which
is great
> for finicky work as you can see the needle much better. The
stitch is
> the same as the FW, a beautiful straight stitch.
>
> --
Thanks for reply Joanne,
but if we are going to talk about the 301 should we also mention
the 404 ?
but then again there is no handle on 404
thanks again,
rob
> stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us.earth.milky-way.com
> http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/
|