|
Posted by Amitaibu on June 27, 2008, 1:25 pm
On Jun 27, 8:09=A0pm, sewboyz_at_live_dot_...@foo.com (sew boyz) wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> sew boyz had written this in response tohttp://www.sewgirls.com/textiles/=
Re-Academic-research-3759-.htm=A0:
show/hide quoted text
> Amitaibu wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 6:44=3DA0pm, (Sew Boyz) wrote:
> >> How trustworthy is your "academic research" going to be
> >> if you don't know
> >> the difference between "accept" and "except"?
> >> sb
> > Well, English isn't my first language - Hebrew is. Don't you agree
> > there is a difference between writing a post and writing a work?
> My apologies, I didn't realize you were not an English speaker. =A0Had yo=
u
show/hide quoted text
> posted from your own ISP (@bezeqint.net) instead of google-groups-gmail i=
t
show/hide quoted text
> might have alerted me to your location.
> sb
> ##-----------------------------------------------##
> Delivered via =A0http://www.sewgirls.com/
> Sewing Community of the Net
> Web and RSS access to your favorite newsgroup -
> rec.crafts.textiles.sewing - 3536 messages and counting!
> ##-----------------------------------------------##
SB,
No problem :)
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> > @Samanth Hill,
> > There are of course some MTM pattern software out-there including the
> > newly released Bernina's MyLabel. However, these software are
> > negligible if you consider the 'usual' companies.
> I am glad to see you came back! Hang around for a while and get to know us!
> Your survey still failed to include the possiblity of people already
> using pattern-drafting software, whether it's software that lets you
> design your own patterns or software that has one or more specific
> patterns that you can print in your own size. It would really be to
> your benefit to factor that into your survey or else to exclude those
> people who primarily use pattern-drafting software of some sort,
> otherwise your results will be based on false premises.
> If you have done your homework and know for sure that usage of
> pattern-drafting software is negligible, then in order to obtain truly
> useful information, you need to exclude those people. If you haven't,
> then you ought to provide an option for them to indicate that they
> already use what you are trying to research.
> There are a large number of people on this list who use pattern-drafting
> software and/or more independent designers and very few Big 3 pattern
> companies. For such as person, answering your survey is a confusing
> process with all the questions that don't really apply and will make
> your survey results somewhat inaccurate because of the necessity of
> using "best guess" method to choose the "least incorrect" answer instead
> of choosing the "most correct" answer.