> Sew Boyz had written this in response to > http://www.sewgirls.com/textiles/Re-Academic-research-3768-.htm : > > Pogonip wrote: > >> sew boyz wrote: >>> harumph! like boys don't sew! >>> ---sb--- >>> Harumph! to you, too! If you'll look around, you'll see several men >> who >> post regularly to this N.G. because they do anywhere from a little to a > >> lot of sewing. We make no assumptions here - what sewgirls >> does....well....I have no idea since I've never looked at their site. > > I think perhaps you missed my point...my sewgirls.com sign-on name was > chosen to disparage sewGIRLS' sexism , ergo Sew BOYZ. > > Get it? :D > > ---sb--- > (a guy who sews)
I comprehend your post, but I do not "get it."
--
Joanne
stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us.earth.milky-way.com
http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/
Posted by Joy Beeson on June 27, 2008, 11:49 pm
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:57:06 -0700, Samantha Hill - remove TRASH to
> Your survey still failed to include the possiblity of people already > using pattern-drafting software,
Not to mention pattern-drafting wetware.
Joy Beeson
--
joy beeson at comcast dot net
http://roughsewing.home.comcast.net/ -- sewing
http://n3f.home.comcast.net/ -- Writers' Exchange
The above message is a Usenet post.
I don't recall having given anyone permission to use it on a Web site.
Posted by Kay Lancaster on June 26, 2008, 10:42 pm
>> I was not interested in volunteering "...10-15 min.." of my >> valuable time to a first-time poster asking for 'our' help >> with its commercial(?) project. YMMV > Well, I was curious enough to see what the focus of the survey was.
Then there's the whole issue of self-selected survey participants and invalid
statistics...
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> I think perhaps you missed my point...my sewgirls.com sign-on name was
> chosen to disparage sewGIRLS' sexism , ergo Sew BOYZ.
>
> Get it? :D