|
Posted by IMS on February 8, 2006, 6:03 pm
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
>>On 7 Feb 2006 19:15:42 -0800, itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Kay Lancaster wrote:
>>>> http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml06/06082.html
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> I went back and re-read the recall and I'm wondering if this is the
>>> original recall from several years ago and they thought best to make =
it
show/hide quoted text
>>> public again?? Interesting!
>>The 1/1+ machines seem to be snakebit... CPSC announcements are:
>>Dec 1999: Designer 1+: defective power cord/transformer connection; =
shock risk
show/hide quoted text
>> 11,000 machines
>>Oct 2002: Designer 1: power supply smoking/catching fire
>> 1,100 machines
>>Feb 2006: Designer 1: power supply arcing; 3 fires
>> 5,500 machines
>Kay,
>The 1+ is different than the Designer 1 (The 1+ was the Viking TOL
>before the Designer 1 came out). I don't think the 1+ has ever had a
>recall.
>--Welmoed
Actually, it has:
http://www.cpsc.gov/CPSCPUB/PREREL/prhtml00/00026b.html
-Irene
--------------
You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.=20
--Mae West=20
--------------
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>>>=20
>>> Kay Lancaster wrote:
>>>> http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml06/06082.html
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> I went back and re-read the recall and I'm wondering if this is the
>>> original recall from several years ago and they thought best to make =