If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Bernadette on May 24, 2008, 5:50 am
On Fri, 23 May 2008 20:22:03 -0700, mirjam wrote:
show/hide quoted text
<snipped>
>> Bless you Noreen and thanks. I always feel a bit guilty if I take up a
>> lot of other people's time on these groups - you've made me feel more
>> comfortable about it. :-)
>> PS, it's good to see you back here posting again. --
show/hide quoted text
> Never feel guilty about this Bernadette , If a SUBJECT was thrown in the
> public place it is better to solve it in the piblic place, that said i did
> answer you last long letter also in private and i don`t know if you got it
> ?
No, I have not received that Mirjam but my e-mail address shown here is
not a real one. I only posted my proper address once on a newsgroup and
for months afterwards received all manner of strange and wonderful offers
- most of which I would have needed to be a male to use if I could
have worked out what the various accoutrements were for !!!!!! It got so
bad that I stopped using that mail box and set up a new one. I will send
my address to you today. :-)
show/hide quoted text
> The matters that arise here are General human discussions, It
was not
show/hide quoted text
> you that started the problem , and for that matter not me either . but
> you reacted to my reaction about some unkind posts that were durected at
> me.
Mirjam I did not react to your reply. I reacted to the unkindness shown
in some of the comments BEFORE you replied.
I have always believed /written/said that if i am approached
show/hide quoted text
> unkindly by someone in public , and don`t settle it in the same place
> where it happened, newcomers to the internet will eventually think that
> unkindness is the rule. By openly discussing the matters, like you & me
> did , EVERYBODY understands that it is not acceptable to be unkindly.
> mirjam
Yes indeed. That final sentence I agree with 100%.
Bernadette
|
|
Posted by on May 21, 2008, 5:04 pm
wrote:
show/hide quoted text
> Now I remember why I quit reading this newsgroup for a few years...
> --
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -:=A6:-
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =B7.=B7=B4=A8 =A8))
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =B8.=B7=B4 =A0.=B7=B4=A8=A8))
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ..=B7=B4 =A0 =A0Chris
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ((=B8=B8.=B7=B4 =A0..=B7=B4
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-:=A6:- =A0((=B8=B8
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=B7.=B7
Excuse me CHRIS this Ng was always nice, considerate and every one was
patient.
The few people who thought that they+ had to be unkind , felt that
this wasn`t the place and eventually stopped doing it , After a nasty
attack of foul posts a big part of this group mooved to a closed
list.
I am very sorry if my answer to Mary disturbed you , it seems that in
the last weeks she jumps at my posts whatever i write........
mirjam
|
|
Posted by YarnWright on May 22, 2008, 4:30 pm
Chris Underwood spun a FINE 'yarn':
show/hide quoted text
>Now I remember why I quit reading this newsgroup for a few years...
<end quoted>
Chris Underwood. . .
Coming back from Lurkdom, Chris?
Good to see you, even if your post was misguided....
Noreen
--
http://www.lulu.com/yarnwright http://yarnwright.etsy.com http://yarnwright.com http://noreensknitche.com http://noreensknitche.weblogs.us http://optional-knitting.com http://yarnscapes.com ---
avast! AV: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 080522-0, 05/22/2008
Tested: 5/22/2008 3:30:24 PM
avast! - (c) 1988-2006
http://www.avast.com
|
|
Posted by YarnWright on May 22, 2008, 4:26 pm
Mary Fisher spun a FINE 'yarn':
show/hide quoted text
>>Mary
>>Do some research. Mirjam and I as well as quite a few others here who are
>>really INTO renaisance times HAVE done the research, and know what of we
speak.
show/hide quoted text
>>Noreen
>>who knows you just have a vendetta against Mirjam, and will fight YOU every
>>step of the way. SHE belongs, your ATTITUDE doesn't.
>Ahem. You seem to have a vendetta against me, I don't against anyone :-)
>And I do know quite a lot about armour; although I don't make it and we don't
wear it
show/hide quoted text
>(we're 100% non-combatant in role as well as in real life) many of my friends
and
show/hide quoted text
>fellow traders do. We're not 'into' rennaissance activities, we practise earlier
>skills. My husband is a metallurgist and takes a keen interest in such things.
He's a
show/hide quoted text
>very practical man (he does most of the mediaeval textiles in this house). I
asked him
show/hide quoted text
>about this matter yesterday evening, he said wire could be twisted into
something
show/hide quoted text
>resembling a pan scrub but it wouldn't be nehlbindning - which needs a needle.
>You really shouldn't assume that others have no experience or historical
knowledge.
show/hide quoted text
>Next time I go to the Royal Armouries Museum (within walking distance of home)
I'll ask
show/hide quoted text
>the Curator of Armour (who we know because we've been involved with the
Armouries since
show/hide quoted text
>before it came to the city, we were invited to the Queen's opening) - but
shan't bother
show/hide quoted text
>putting his answers here because I suspect that they wouldn't be believed.
>Mary
Mary Fisher. . .
I only see evidence of your continually being contrary to whatever Mirjam
writes/posts
about on ANY subject, THAT is what I refer to as a 'vendetta'.
I didn't say that you DON'T know anything, I merely pointed out that others DO
know of
what they speak/write, yet YOU accuse anyone who disagrees with your
self-conceived
'smarts' as not knowing of what they're talking about.
As for knowledge you DO have, no one disputes that, just the way you PRESENT it,
as if
you are the only person on the planet who knows something.
You remind me of the poem
Mary, Mary, quite contrary......
sorry, but that's the way it/you come(s) across.....
Noreen
--
http://www.lulu.com/yarnwright http://yarnwright.etsy.com http://yarnwright.com http://noreensknitche.com http://noreensknitche.weblogs.us http://optional-knitting.com http://yarnscapes.com ---
avast! AV: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 080522-0, 05/22/2008
Tested: 5/22/2008 3:25:57 PM
avast! - (c) 1988-2006
http://www.avast.com
|
|
Posted by on May 20, 2008, 11:56 pm
show/hide quoted text
> ...
> How can (genuine) mail armour be made by n=E5hlbindning?
> Even that made for modern use, e.g. metal gloves to protect butchers' hand=
s,
show/hide quoted text
> are made by connected rings. N=E5hlbindning depends on flexible 'yarn' of =
some
show/hide quoted text
> kind.
> In fact (before anyone corrects me) my use of the word 'rings' is wrong
> because the elements are penannular - not enclosed. That's how the 'rings'=
show/hide quoted text
> can be threaded through each other. They only beconme complete circles whe=
n
show/hide quoted text
> riveted together.
> Mary
Mary , you made an effort to tell me that your name was almost like
mine ,,,,,,thus why did you overlook that I specificly wrote that it
was `some sort of,,,,` meaning it was not exactly but it looks quite
like it !!!!
mirjam
|
Page 7 of 9 < 1 2 3 > last >>
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: Knitted Hat Pattern | June 26, 2005, 9:16 am |
| Knitted Flowers? | July 9, 2006, 10:00 am |
| knitted ferrari | December 10, 2006, 7:30 am |
| Help with knitted slippers | December 10, 2006, 9:10 pm |
| Knitted Slippers | January 5, 2007, 12:46 pm |
| FO: Knitted Strawberries | March 2, 2008, 7:35 pm |
| knitted cottons | March 4, 2008, 11:53 pm |
| knitted bicycle | May 18, 2008, 11:48 pm |
| knitted quilts | January 6, 2009, 3:36 pm |
| Re: knitted quilts | January 13, 2009, 4:58 am |
|
|
>> Bless you Noreen and thanks. I always feel a bit guilty if I take up a
>> lot of other people's time on these groups - you've made me feel more
>> comfortable about it. :-)
>> PS, it's good to see you back here posting again. --