|
Posted by on March 11, 2008, 7:36 am
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:07:56 +0000, Richard Eney wrote:
> >>On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:29:02 -0700, mirjam wrote:
>
> > <snip>
>
> >>> Mistakes ?? you mean those delightful changes in patterns ? that occur=
> >>> here and there ?
> >>> mirjam
>
> >>Those are the ones! If they add a new dimension to the design I leave
> >>them in place. If not, then they have to go - and the ones that nobody
> >>other than me will notice just get ignored. =A0;-D
>
> > I keep thinking I'll leave some of them because nobody else will notice.=
..
> > then I fix them, because _I_ notice. Then I decide I want to reverse the=
> > color pattern. =A0Then I notice some mistakes that I hadn't seen before.=
..
> > I've reknitted part of this darned hat five times so far. =A0It's only t=
he
> > lining, but the hat is reversible so somebody might see the inside
> > someday.
>
> > =3DTamar
>
> That made me giggle Tamar. It is exactly how I used to be - everything
> had to be absolutely perfect as mistakes were not acceptable. I now call
> them "changes in the pattern" or "artistic licence".
>
> My Dad had a saying for a situation like that. "A man in a runaway horse
> and cart will never stop to complain about it". =A0;-)
>
> --
> Blessed are the cracked for they let in the light- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ladies you are making me smile
thank you
mirjam
|